#10. Paris, final part.
Day 5. 7th of March. Our final day in Paris. As people usually say at the end of the trip, it is time to sum up. Shortly, we’ve seen practically everything, people were extremely pleasant, we walked around Paris to exhaustion, but meals were not so great as expected, but nevertheless. I was lucky today to eat delicious food, but only today. After remaining alone, I’ve decided to discover Palais Challot. Day has stood out remarkable, solar, in the afternoon it was extremely warm.
Expectations that Palais Challot conceals in itself interiors of the 18th century weren't justified. It has appeared that the palace Challot is just a name of the building, nothing more. But Cite de l'Architecture et du Patrimoine was very pleasant. I don’t understand much in architecture, especially in French, but it didn’t prevent me from enjoying it. It wasn’t a waste of time. Moreover, I was greatly warmed by the sun behind Tour d'Eiffel, have taken pictures of myself and of those who asked me to photo them, and after that was the tastiest part. Hmm, cafe du Trocadero... Coq au vin, soupe de poisson, glass of Chablis. . It tasted great and the meals were typically French (!) for the first time in Paris.
The general estimation of this world capital according to a five-point scale – tense four. For Notre Dame, Louvre, a sight from Tour d'Eiffel at night and good shops. The city is larger-than-life, confusing, but this fact doesn’t belittle its charm. We lacked one day for Versailles and palaces of the Loire valley.
Verdict – Paris is necessary to be visited unequivocally, and not once. That was my first second impression of Paris (first time have been there about 10 years ago).
Expectations that Palais Challot conceals in itself interiors of the 18th century weren't justified. It has appeared that the palace Challot is just a name of the building, nothing more. But Cite de l'Architecture et du Patrimoine was very pleasant. I don’t understand much in architecture, especially in French, but it didn’t prevent me from enjoying it. It wasn’t a waste of time. Moreover, I was greatly warmed by the sun behind Tour d'Eiffel, have taken pictures of myself and of those who asked me to photo them, and after that was the tastiest part. Hmm, cafe du Trocadero... Coq au vin, soupe de poisson, glass of Chablis. . It tasted great and the meals were typically French (!) for the first time in Paris.
The general estimation of this world capital according to a five-point scale – tense four. For Notre Dame, Louvre, a sight from Tour d'Eiffel at night and good shops. The city is larger-than-life, confusing, but this fact doesn’t belittle its charm. We lacked one day for Versailles and palaces of the Loire valley.
Verdict – Paris is necessary to be visited unequivocally, and not once. That was my first second impression of Paris (first time have been there about 10 years ago).
